Saturday 10 May 08 - 23:03
 

Industry News

Businesses fear green regulations mean more red tape

A survey of British businesses has revealed strong concern that Government regulation to reduce carbon emissions will make the UK uncompetitive and add more cost than benefits. The npower survey found that 75% of intensive energy users surveyed think the combined pressures of the Climate Change Levy, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the new CRC will place an undue burden on business. 

The fifth npower Business Energy Index canvassed senior managers and energy buyers at SMEs and large industrial and commercial firms on attitudes to energy use, costs and CO2 emissions, revealing the unease within the business community about the existing CO2 reduction framework of regulation. 

When questioned about the new Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) – a new carbon reduction scheme aimed at large businesses, announced last year in the Energy White Paper[1] – 71% of intensive energy users said they believed that the scheme would make the UK uncompetitive. And, when asked about the implementation of such regulation, 63% of respondents said they thought the costs of doing so would outweigh the benefits. Less than half (48%) believed that the CRC would achieve its target of removing 1.2 million tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere each year by 2020.

The Government has shown a desire to involve businesses in meeting the UK’s CO2 reduction targets and introduced a framework of regulation to incentivise and reward emission reduction, but npower business’s findings would indicate companies need further convincing that this is the best method. Comments from the report suggest that British businesses feel penalised as other European and global businesses do not have to conform to the same administrative and financial requirements imposed by UK regulation.

“Businesses have faced a raft of new legislation in recent years, with more now promised in the form of the CRC, so it is understandable that they may feel the responsibility to reduce CO2 is being placed at their door. However, with the UK’s CO2 emission targets becoming legally binding this year, we cannot escape the fact that all businesses will be called on to reduce their carbon footprint,” said Paul Coffey, managing director of npower business.

“While the need to actively reduce CO2 has become a business requirement in only the last few years, it will increasingly become a priority as low carbon outputs become evermore linked with strong financial performance. Those that identify the advantages of low carbon operations now, and work within the existing legislative framework, will be the ones that benefit in the future,” he added.

Mr. Coffey points to the fact that advice is available from energy providers and government organisations, which can assist businesses in reducing CO2 output. The nBEI clearly suggests businesses are in need of guidance: 56% agreed they would value help in reducing CO2 emissions and 50% said they would welcome guidance to improve energy efficiency.

While the findings would suggest a lack of support for carbon reduction regulation in business, the latest Index reveals mixed messages. A significant majority of respondents (88%) said they support the Government’s commitment to reduce CO2 emissions and 56% also said they thought compliance with climate change agreements had resulted in energy savings or process improvements. Also, 36% said they believed there were commercial advantages to be had from a small carbon footprint – a significantly higher response than in npower business’s 2007 report, which revealed widespread misunderstanding of the Low Carbon Economy. Comments from the research suggest that business customers are becoming more environmentally conscious, leading to those selling to them seeing benefit in meeting this demand.

npower business believes the framework of legislation will call on businesses to develop new business models if they are to succeed within a Low Carbon Economy, with energy use no exception.

“Businesses will have to develop policies to manage the risks associated with energy use including cost, environmental and societal risks. In this way, decisions on energy buying and investment in efficiency measures that can reduce CO2 outputs can be assessed on a more holistic basis, rather than just cost. This moves away from a quick win scenario in which energy efficiency measures are only made for financial gain to a more progressive strategy in which the approach to energy management and CO2 reduction is aligned with business goals,” added Mr Coffey.

Images for this article - click to enlarge

All images copyright © Mercator Media 2008

Stevens Rowsell is a specialist precision sheet metal engineering company in East Sussex